• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:55:14 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B5F5@HQ5>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
>
> Perhaps and time will tell.  But locally, I see 
> XDR, not XSD and never UML.   But that is local. 
> My guess is that experiences will vary a lot by 
> locale.

UML gets used; I've also seen it requested as system documentation
(class dias and swimlanes) as opposed to a modelling technology.

 
> People build these and believe they are building 
> a standard when in most cases, they are just 
> modeling their local system ambitiously.  

:)

Bill de hÓra

• References:
  • RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
• Next by Date: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread