• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:45:19 -0700
• Cc: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CB5@r...> <006301c2109a$e68cf280$0300a8c0@skonnardomni> <20020610174934.GA12033@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Amelia A Lewis wrote:

> In XML, typing specifies validation algorithms.

Hmm... well it also allows software to unpack XML instances into native 
storage in a sensible way without being savvy to the internals of the 
applications that generated or will use the data.

My question is, is there a need for this? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@i...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)

• Prev by Date: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
• Next by Date: RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread