• To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>,"'Amelia A Lewis'" <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:25:07 -0600
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D04F3BF.7080500@t...>

> Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> 
> > In XML, typing specifies validation algorithms.
>
> Tim Bray:
>
> Hmm... well it also allows software to unpack XML instances into
native
> storage in a sensible way without being savvy to the internals of the
> applications that generated or will use the data.
> 
> My question is, is there a need for this? -Tim

It also facilitates the reverse scenario: exposing strongly-typed data
(database, object graph, whatever...) as an Infoset, which can be
processed using any of XML's layered services (XPath, XSLT, XML Query,
etc.) in a natural way. The demand for such functionality seems to be
growing as businesses see it simplifying the server integration story.

-aaron

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread