• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Simon Fell <xml@z...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:16:27 -0700
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CC0@r...>
• Organization: pocketsoap.com
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CC0@r...>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:07:17 -0700, in xml you wrote:

>You keep going on and on about how difficult this is to implement in
>Java yet Microsoft shipped this functionality in .NET a few months ago.
>Given the similarities between C# + CLR and Java + JVM, I just don't see
>how your arguments have any leg to stand on besides intense dislike of
>W3C XML Schema (which is understandable *chuckle*) . 

well, Microsoft shipped this functionality for a subset of XSD.

Cheers
Simon

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: Borrowed email address for virus
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread