[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
james anderson wrote: > We disagree. Actually, I think we disagree only on the point of whether non-qualified names in the absence of a default namespace are "in" a namespace. We both agree that they can be treated as being in a null namespace, and both theory and practice proceed nicely from that point. We can now go back to arguing about DTD syntax :) -- Ron
|

Cart



