• Subject: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:18:04 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., dsdl-comment@d...
• Organization: nil
• References: <200206111731.NAA15897@m...> <3D08BEA2.F7AADDE4@s...> <3D09AED2.9602A805@r...> <3D09BA64.84350F77@s...> <3D09C037.76FE8D65@r...>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

Ronald Bourret wrote:
> 
> james anderson wrote:
> 
 ...
> > How is one to use a declaration with indefinite scope to emulate the
> > lexical scope of attribute-based declarations within the
> > document entity?
> 
> One doesn't. Why is this a requirement? (Note that the proposed
> validation DTD is no different from other schema languages in this
> respect. Neither is intended to perform lexical validation of QNames.)
> 

If this is true, then one eliminates those document forms which exhibit synonomy and/or homography from the set of conforming
documents. Which exclused exactly those documents for which one really needs the machinery entailed by namespaces.

...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
  • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
  • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Next by Date: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Next by thread: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread