• To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: SAX Question
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:43:57 -0400
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B597@HQ5>

[Bullard, Claude L (Len)]

> shouldn't SAX treat these identically?
>
> The odd result is that using XMLReader (MS),
> the second guy results in a call to the
> error handler and the first doesn't.  Is that right?

I misread "end handler" for "error handler" in my post a minute ago.  But
still, the second form shouldn't be causing an error, for it's perfectly
good xml.  It could have a whitespace node that the first doesn't, but the
MS parser likes to strip those out anyway.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • SAX Question
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX Question
• Next by Date: Re: What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: Best Practice - beyond schema)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX Question
• Next by thread: Re: SAX Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread