• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 21:23:17 -0400
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C69B59@r...>

[Dare Obasanjo]

> Jonathan
>
> (Whew, that was easy! I sure hope he doesn't ask the next
> obvious question....)
>

I assume the next question is why xs:integer is not a primitive in W3C
XML Schema to which the answer is that it is derived from xs:decimal

What exactly is your problem with this?

[Tom P]

Aside from the fact that it is mathematically wrong, even if lexically OK?
I was shocked when first I saw this derivation in the Schema Rec.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by thread: Re: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread