[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


At 9:23 PM -0400 5/13/02, Thomas B. Passin wrote:


>I assume the next question is why xs:integer is not a primitive in W3C
>XML Schema to which the answer is that it is derived from xs:decimal
>
>What exactly is your problem with this?
>
>[Tom P]
>
>Aside from the fact that it is mathematically wrong, even if lexically OK?

I don't see an objection on mathematical grounds. The integers are a 
proper subset of the rational numbers. Why would you claim this is 
*mathematically* wrong?
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|             http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member