• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 13 May 2002 20:02:43 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513160517.03e76008@n...>
• References: <<5.1.0.14.0.20020511115542.026fd8a8@n...> <<5.1.0.14.0.20020510141922.0360dea8@n...> <<5.1.0.14.0.20020510130531.01665d98@n...> <<5.1.0.14.0.20020510123018.03dba770@n...><5.1.0.14.0.20020510123018.03dba770@n...><5.1.0.14.0.20020510130531.01665d98@n...><5.1.0.14.0.20020510141922.0360dea8@n...><5.1.0.14.0.20020511115542.026fd8a8@n...> <5.1.0.14.0.20020513160517.03e76008@n...>

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 19:20, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> Asking for nouns rather than adjectives? It's a really sneaky tactic, I 
> admit...

Yes, it is very sneaky.  Asking for nouns effectively means asking for
features.  Adjectives are useful tools for trimming features.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by Date: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Next by thread: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread