• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:31:49 -0700
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C69B2D@r...>

At 11:59 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

><sarcasm>
>It's good to see that the W3C does extensive research on the user
>scenarios for the "new science" they develop before foisting them on the
>WWW community.
></sarcasm>

Sigh.

Sarcasm is so easy. Finding solutions that will meet the needs of all our 
users is so difficult.  I guess that makes those of us who design these 
things very vulnerable.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread