• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 22:58:08 +0000
• In-reply-to: <1021446636.1421.128.camel@ibook>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513184017.0363e488@m...> <1021446636.1421.128.camel@ibook>

In <1021446636.1421.128.camel@ibook>, Eric van der Vlist
<vdv@d...> wrote:

| Exactly! The problem IMO is not that W3C wants to define *a* schema
| language and *a* query language, but that they want to define *the*
| schema language and *the* query language.

Yes.  That's the reason for sillinesses like 'xsi:schemaLocation'.  Watch
for 'xq:psviDef' and the like to make their appearances shortly (all
partaking of the same old nudge-nudge-wink-wink.)

• References:
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Previous by thread: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Next by thread: RE: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread