• To: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo)
• Subject: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: richard@c... (Richard Tobin), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621C09@r...> from "Dare Obasanjo" at May 15, 2002 01:45:32 PM

Dare Obasanjo scripsit:

> Forgive my ignorance but exactly what does isomorphic mean in lay terms?

"Having the same structure as".

> I am sure that I've been misinterpreting in the XSD spec. Speaking of
> terms in the W3C XML Schema recommendation I didn't fully grasp, how do
> you modulo one set of rules against another set of rules?

"Modulo" in such sentences usually just means "except".

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Previous by thread: RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread