• To: <AndrewWatt2000@a...>,<jonathan.robie@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 19:08:13 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <8b.180abb01.2a0e49d3@a...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

So, I will ask you once more: "What is the vision/strategy for XPath 2.0?".

You will not get a single answer to that question. W3C is a consortium, it exists in order to achieve compromises. Many of the members have their own vision. The concensus between members is documents in the agreed charters and requirements statements, which are published.

 

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...

• References:
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread