• To: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@m...>,"'Jeni Tennison'" <jeni@j...>,"'Uche Ogbuji'" <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 19:00:32 +0100
• Cc: "'Jonathan Robie'" <jonathan.robie@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>,<public-qt-comments@w...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C69B2D@r...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...] 
> Sent: 10 May 2002 19:59
> 
> Changing the semantics of XPath's logic operators because of DBMSs is
> ridiculous when one considers that DBMSs are not and most likely will
> not in future be the primary users of XPath. 
> 

I have to tell you that the person who has been arguing most
vociferously that it must be possible to use XPath/XQuery for retrieving
data from an SQL database is your colleague Michael Rys. Perhaps you
have more influence over him than I do?


Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s... 

• References:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread