• To: <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:58:03 +0100
• Cc: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@m...>,"'Jonathan Borden'" <jborden@a...>,"'Jonathan Robie'" <jonathan.robie@d...>,"'James Clark'" <jjc@j...>,"'David G. Durand'" <david.durand@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200205071412.g47EBpC21868@l...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> XPath 2.0/XSLT 2.0 gives us a highly limited yet
> complex system wedded to a single, flawed schema definition language.
>
The XPath 2.0 data model is based on the PSVI, not on the schema definition
language. It's explicitly an aim that you can generate the PSVI by
validation against a DTD, it should also be possible to generate it by
validation against other schema languages.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by thread: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread