• To: <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:55:13 +0100
• Cc: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200205071357.g47DuxX21711@l...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> This sounds like a common sense opening for conformance levels.
>
> Let me ask the obverse of your point: for people whose
> XML/XPath/XSLT tools do not, and don't ever expect to support
> XSDL, why would the XSL WG shove it down their throats?
>
A conformance level that doesn't require schema support is certainly on the
cards. We want to work out what all the features are before we start
defining subsets.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...

• References:
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5?)
• Next by Date: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread