• To: "'AndrewWatt2000@a...'" <AndrewWatt2000@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: W3C style bodies aren't working anymore - Discuss
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:32:08 -0500
• Cc: me@a...

Andrew, until they can work out the difference 
between a standard for interoperating technologies 
and specifications for emerging technologies, this 
is hopeless.  It will always go to the same strange 
attractors.

Standardize what works.  Specify what you want to work. 
Send the marketing guys to the standards meetings.  Send 
the engineers to the specification design projects.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: AndrewWatt2000@a... [mailto:AndrewWatt2000@a...]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/2002MayJun/0006.html

I thought at least some list members would be interested in the above, given 
the frustration that has been expressed on this list in the recent past in 
relation to XSLT 2.0, XPath 2.0 and so on.

• Prev by Date: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: R ESTTutorial)
• Previous by thread: BLOAT, April Fool's joke, but..
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: R ESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread