• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: undeclared attribute types
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 08:42:43 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200204191219.IAA05589@m...>
• References: <200204191219.IAA05589@m...>

At 8:19 AM -0400 4/19/02, John Cowan wrote:


>>  (The restriction to non-validating processors here is IMO an erratum in
>>  the spec which I just reported to the editors.)
>
>Validating processors treat undeclared attributes as validity errors.
>

However, a validity error does not necessarily stop processing. A 
validating parser may need to provide a normalized value for an 
attribute, even though the document is invalid.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|             http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • Re: undeclared attribute types
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patents
• Next by Date: OT: (RE: Patents)
• Previous by thread: Re: undeclared attribute types
• Next by thread: Re: undeclared attribute types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread