• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 19:44:18 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3CACEAAB.42ADBAFF@r...>

4/4/2002 7:07:07 PM, Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...> wrote:

> namespaces are the only part of the infoset that
>are not defined in the XML 1.0 spec. Put another way, namespaces are
>part of XML 1.0 in a de facto sense, even if they lack de jure status.

That's a pretty compelling argument, IMHO.  As I implied in an earlier
reply to Len, conceptual integrity has a "value" all its own, even though
that is hard to quantify in a cost/benefit analysis.

• References:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread