Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 16:42, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > It's funny how differently one can look at an extensible message based > framework without much core functionality other than extensibility > itself. Some say that it can be used for a lot, others that it doesn't > do much. At some level, they are both right. That's generous of you, but it doesn't really answer my question. > In any case, > xml-dist-app@w... *is* the right place to discuss this. I would > therefore strongly encourage you to continue the discussion there > although I realize that it is annoying to have to argue ones point with > folks who don't see it that way. I'm always happy to argue, but W3C lists seem to have a common culture of "thou shalt not question the motivations of the Working Group." People are supposedly trying to get work done there, and I generally find it wiser to ask rude questions like these on forums with a fundamentally more open outlook. I suspect that most of xml-dist-app would prefer that I continue that policy. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
