• To: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 03 Apr 2002 18:46:06 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200204032233.XAA10937@s...>
• References: <200204032233.XAA10937@s...>

On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:33, Richard Tobin wrote:
> >Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
> >into the XML-1.1 req/draft?
> 
> A true unification of the XML and Namespaces spec would only make
> sense if various other things were done, in particular dealing with
> the special-case "pseudo-namespaced" attributes xml:lang and
> xml:space.  This would be a good thing, but we decided not to add that
> to our task-list right now.

I guess I'm just curious - what exactly does "deal with... xml:lang and
xml:space" mean?

I thought Namespaces in XML already defined a namespace for them in
section 4...
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: SQL DTD and related questions
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread