• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 12 Feb 2002 11:52:54 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200202121538.g1CFcmj25675@d...>
• References: <3C68E697.C5B17230@p...> <1013451210.845.127.camel@l...><E16aL5C-0003Jv-00@s...><3C6812D1.B94704D7@p...><E16aNkh-0000Q3-00@s...> <200202121538.g1CFcmj25675@d...>

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 10:38, Joe English wrote:
> IOW: HTTP is good when a typical session consists of a single
> POST or GET;  BEEP is good when sessions get more complicated.

I like the notion of a spectrum of possibilities.  BEEP certainly seems
capable of supporting very complex modes of communication.  HTTP can be
useful for request-response.  I'd like something that's just 'send' (aka
XMLChucker) to fill out the bottom.  

I don't think there's a single true way.  BEEP ain't it, REST ain't it,
SOAP ain't it.  (Whatever the WSIO might want us to think.)
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: amyzing@t... (Amy Lewis )

• References:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: Stylesheets for generating XML Schema documentation
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread