• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:03:04 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1013454682.1027.143.camel@l...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <1013451210.845.127.camel@l...> <3C68021A.98D28BF1@p...> <1013454682.1027.143.camel@l...>

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:40, Paul Prescod wrote:
> REST doesn't adore HTTP. It's the other way around. HTTP 1.1 was
> designed as a protocol for REST. ;)

Even Roy doesn't claim this. He claims that HTTP 1.1 was *guided* by 
REST.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: RE: WSIO- With Name
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread