• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:01:19 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3C68021A.98D28BF1@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <1013451210.845.127.camel@l...> <3C68021A.98D28BF1@p...>

> If you do that, you make it extremely difficult to build
> intermediaries like:
>
>  * store-and-forward services
>  * caches
>  * firewalls
>  * proxies
>  * message routers
>  * privacy managing intermediaries

This is not strictly true. 

I don't think you can assume that visibility is always a good 
thing.... and I would say that in many cases, HTTP 1.1 proxies have 
too much visibility, especially from a security perspective.... the 
classic "man in the middle attack" can be made fairly easily unless 
you're using SSL etc.

I think disclosure/visibilitycan be an archilles heel...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Compring two XML docs from Java
• Next by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread