• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: WSIO and Good is Better
• From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:00:44 -0600 (CST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <005101c1b054$f43b4130$4bc8a8c0@A...>

References, herewith:

http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2002-01-16-a.html
"U.S. Federal CIO Council XML Working Group Issues
 XML Developer's Guide"

-------------------------------------------------------------------

> I wish that the XML.COM article on the CIO draft had
> actually included some references to the document.
> 
> The article is pitched as if it means that non-W3C (presumably
> excepting ISO, formally) specifications are being blocked, rather 
> than that W3C is being added to some favoured list.  

Cheers
Rick 

>> From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
>> Sure as heck shreds the CIO proclamations for 
>> W3C-only tech.  It's a CALS redux: the procurement 
>> officers sign the checks and that drives the 
>> emergence, not the standard or the imprimatur.

- Robin Cover

• References:
  • Re: WSIO and Good is Better
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Documents within documents
• Next by Date: XML Designing Problems.
• Previous by thread: Re: WSIO and Good is Better
• Next by thread: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread