• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: WSIO and Good is Better
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:59:06 +1100
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE807@HQ5>

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

> Sure as heck shreds the CIO proclamations for 
> W3C-only tech.  It's a CALS redux: the procurement 
> officers sign the checks and that drives the 
> emergence, not the standard or the imprimatur.

I wish that the XML.COM article on the CIO draft had actually
included some references to the document.

The article is pitched as if it means that non-W3C (presumably
excepting ISO, formally) specifications are being blocked, rather 
than that W3C is being added to some favoured list.  

Cheers
Rick 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WSIO and Good is Better
    • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>

• References:
  • RE: WSIO and Good is Better
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Doctypes again (was Re: Documents within documents)
• Next by Date: Re: Documents within documents
• Previous by thread: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• Next by thread: Re: WSIO and Good is Better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread