• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:51:40 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020218110754.01ce6b78@p...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020219133846.01d73860@p...>

Sean McGrath wrote:
> 
> [John Cowan]
> >By no means.  GETs are allowed to be idempotent, which means that
> >the act of GETting cannot change the resource.
> 
> What if the resource is an XML representation of
> "the number of times I have received a GET"?

Doctor, it hurts when I bend my arm back like this. ;)

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Next by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread