• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:40:17 +0000
• In-reply-to: <E16ctOK-0006Bj-00@m...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020218110754.01ce6b78@p...>

[John Cowan]
>By no means.  GETs are allowed to be idempotent, which means that
>the act of GETting cannot change the resource.

What if the resource is an XML representation of
"the number of times I have received a GET"?

Sean

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Why REST
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: URIs are simply names R)
• Next by Date: RE: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Why REST
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread