• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:14:15 +0100
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020213095321.028aa340@p...> <f5b6651qd9g.fsf@c...> <200202132154.VAA31311@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020211

David Carlisle wrote:

> But as others have said, Schema types don't help in many common uses of
> Qnames in content (Xpath expressions for example). Is XPath a sensible use?

Since you mention XPath, this makes me think that we need 2 different 
QNames datatypes: those like XPath which does not support default 
namespaces and those like W3C XML Schema which does support them!

Otherwise, how can an application know how it can rewrite the prefixes?

Eric
-- 
Rendez-vous a Paris pour mes formations XML/XSLT.
                                           http://dyomedea.com/formation/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Previous by thread: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Next by thread: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread