• To: ht@c...
• Subject: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:54:54 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <f5b6651qd9g.fsf@c...> (ht@c...)
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020213095321.028aa340@p...> <f5b6651qd9g.fsf@c...>

> 1) I was overly terse above, and at least one other respondent has not
> unreasonably misunderstood -- I should have said "any sensible use of
> QNames _in content_ . . ." (as opposed to for element and attribute
> names).

But as others have said, Schema types don't help in many common uses of
Qnames in content (Xpath expressions for example). Is XPath a sensible use?

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: RE: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Next by Date: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Previous by thread: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Next by thread: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread