• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:00:14 -0800
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE880@HQ5>

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> Isn't an architectural form a means to
> establish a reference group that uses a
> set of overlapping but distinct vocabularies?

My brain is working on too many fronts to add architectural forms today.
I'm not trying to be glib. It is certainly the case that architectural
forms are designed to solve many of the hairy ontological problems that
plague information systems. I can't say much more than that without
thinking.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by Date: RE: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Previous by thread: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by thread: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread