Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yeah, that's a rabbit trail today. It just hit me that it is an interesting approach to the problem of having the same web service with different vocabularies per service type. It is almost a topic map for the service semantics. But I am also brain fried. Stayed up too late rehearsing and Steely Dan is full of fat chords. I should stick Agnetha, Benny, Bjorn and Anni-Frid this week. len -----Original Message----- From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote: > > Isn't an architectural form a means to > establish a reference group that uses a > set of overlapping but distinct vocabularies? My brain is working on too many fronts to add architectural forms today. I'm not trying to be glib. It is certainly the case that architectural forms are designed to solve many of the hairy ontological problems that plague information systems. I can't say much more than that without thinking.
|
