• To: "'francis@r...'" <francis@r...>, Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:02:42 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Exactly right, and does it ever make it hard to 
get someone on track. OTOH, that is yet another 
reason to keep up with XML-Dev.

len

From: Francis Norton [mailto:francis@r...]

Perhaps they're confusing "tightly coupled" with "strongly typed" - 
similar sound, almost oppposite meaning?

Don't you hate it when useful terms suffer semantic rot... [OT - I've 
just been reading a 1956 detective story where the hero remembers 
"experimentally making love" to another student, and I'm honestly 
baffled - just when did that phrase start referring to sexual rather 
than social intercourse?]

• Prev by Date: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by Date: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• Previous by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by thread: RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread