• To: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Subject: Re: Namespace terminology
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 17:28:35 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <m31yfzps68.fsf@l...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:


> I started out using "namespace name", but it turns out that
> this is what the namespace URI is called[2].


[snip]


> [2] Why? It's the namespace URI, it doesn't need any more names.

Because it's not technically a URI in all cases; it is a URI
with optional fragment identifier.  Which is not the same
as a URI reference, which is either a URI or a relative URL,
either one with optional fragment identifier.

"Namespace name" is what it is.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Namespace terminology
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • Namespace terminology
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• Prev by Date: Using <choice> to enforce rules
• Next by Date: Re: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace terminology
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace terminology
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread