• To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SOAP and Firewalls
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:57:05 -0800
• Thread-index: AcG7EXu3eyWySeXJQxOzIx84e791iwAA1Jiw
• Thread-topic: SOAP and Firewalls

> So here's a simple test we can do. If we can all come to consensus
that
> firewall avoidance is a BAD THING then we can put together a petition
> that SOAP should use HTTP but simply on a different port. The SOAP
> specification should say: "Applications of SOAP MUST NOT use port 80
> unless they adhere to all of the semantics of HTTP.*"

:-)

While we're at it, why not have the petition say, "Applications of HTTP
MUST NOT use port 80 unless they adhere to all of the semantics of
HTTP.*"

• Prev by Date: RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?
• Next by Date: RE: SOAP and Firewalls
• Previous by thread: RE: On the use of HTTP as a Substrate
• Next by thread: RE: SOAP and Firewalls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread