• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• From: Alan Kent <ajk@m...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:15:10 +1100
• In-reply-to: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEPDDKAA.julian.reschke@g...>; from Julian Reschke on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:47:48PM +0100
• Mail-followup-to: xml-dev@l...
• References: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251952@R...> <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEPDDKAA.julian.reschke@g...>

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:47:48PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > The normalization of CR, LF and CRLF can be avoided by using their
> > character entities. So I still can preserve fidelity.
> 
> I don't think this is true. For instance, using MSXSL, try:

I don't think using an implementation of XSLT is a valid way to
say what the XML spec says should be done. Its always dangerous
to use an implementation (with possible bugs) as a means of saying
what the spec says.

Alan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Previous by thread: RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by thread: RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread