• To: "'K. Ari Krupnikov'" <ari@c...>
• Subject: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:08:09 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Or that mainframe developers don't follow the xml-dev list (which, after
all, does not get participation from every developer out there working with
XML).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: K. Ari Krupnikov [mailto:ari@c...]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:02 PM
> To: Champion, Mike
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  XML and mainframes, yet again
> 
> 
> "Champion, Mike" wrote:
> > 
> > It would be nice if someone who actually used XML on 
> mainframes (I've
> > heard rumors that they are out there) would chime in here.
> 
> Going by the number of replies, I'm guessing that the problem of
> accommodating NELs in documents is very pressing to the XML community.
> Or that the people from whom this problem is pressing are very shy.
> 
> Ari.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: terra incognita
• Next by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Next by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread