• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:44:02 -0800
• References: <D7155AD41ECFD511AF4A00B0D0202CB51DFB81@MAILHOST>

Michael Brennan wrote:
> 
> Or that mainframe developers don't follow the xml-dev list (which, after
> all, does not get participation from every developer out there working with
> XML).

This is more likely. I was talking last week to one of the people at IBM who
raised the NEL issue and she said she simply didn't have time to follow xml-dev
closely, if at all. (It wasn't clear to me which was the case, although, given
her silence in this discussion, I assume the latter.)

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by Date: Binary content and allowed characters in XML
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Next by thread: RE: Displaying Dynamic Text
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread