• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Converting XML to RTF
• From: "Jonathan Perret" <jperret@n...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:40:08 +0100
• References: <004c01c182f9$74ab1040$8682e0d5@NTWELTP02> <02bb01c182fc$689be060$0109e4d5@jperret> <3c2c1b6c.97194989@192.41.14.128>

The older 1.6 spec (Word 2000) is available in HTML at :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnrtfspec/html/rtfspec.asp

Hope this helps
Jonathan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: Re:  Converting XML to RTF


> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:01:52 +0100, "Jonathan Perret" 
> <jperret@n...> wrote:
> 
> >The latest RTF spec (1.7), updated for Word 2002, is at :
> >http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=32443
> >
> >You can do just about anything in RTF, just be extra careful to
> >follow the spec (and then some) because Word has an unfortunate 
> >tendency to crash on malformed RTF files.
> 
> The doc itself crashed my (older) version of Word.  Anybody have
> an RTF version of it?  <vbg>
> 
> -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc.
>   (jeremy@o...)  http://www.omsys.com/

• References:
  • RE: Converting XML to RTF
    • From: "Gert Baudoncq" <gert.baudoncq@w...>
  • Re: Converting XML to RTF
    • From: "Jonathan Perret" <jperret@n...>
  • Re: Converting XML to RTF
    • From: jeremy@o... (Jeremy H. Griffith)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
• Next by Date: RE: SS Scripting vs XSL
• Previous by thread: Re: Converting XML to RTF
• Next by thread: W3C WG Goals (Was Re: validating against the standard W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread