• To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>
• Subject: RE: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• From: "Don Smith" <donalds@i...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:11:34 -0600
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200111151503.PAA01170@p...>

It is indeed a fair percentage. My mistake for missing that when looking
through the Mozilla site before posting.

Thanks,

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@n...]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:04 AM
To: donalds@i...
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  so why don't more browsers support XSLT?



> so why don't more browsers support XSLT?

Well three do, the current versions of mozilla, netscape and internet
explorer. That accounts for a fair percentage of browsers doesn't it?

(Incidentally the lack of a transformation in opera seemed to account
for many of the problems Sean McGrath reported using XML in Opera)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
• Next by Date: Re: Interoperability
• Previous by thread: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Next by thread: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread