• To: donalds@i...
• Subject: Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:03:51 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <PJEGLGKIAHHKOPGBPEIGOEEICBAA.donalds@i...>
• References: <PJEGLGKIAHHKOPGBPEIGOEEICBAA.donalds@i...>

> so why don't more browsers support XSLT?

Well three do, the current versions of mozilla, netscape and internet
explorer. That accounts for a fair percentage of browsers doesn't it?

(Incidentally the lack of a transformation in opera seemed to account
for many of the problems Sean McGrath reported using XML in Opera)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: "Don Smith" <donalds@i...>
  • Re: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • RE: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: "Hugo Ascacibar" <jmazcacibar@w...>

• References:
  • so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
    • From: "Don Smith" <donalds@i...>

• Prev by Date: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Next by Date: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Previous by thread: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Next by thread: RE: so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread