• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Caught napping!
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:35:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3BF0B887.C0F6461@r...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200111102048.PAA11544@h...> <3BEFD820.FE803A93@f...> <3BF0B887.C0F6461@r...>

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 01:07 am, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> Out of curiousity, how many people think of XML in text terms, not model
> terms? My guess is that even proponents of well-formed XML eventually
> fall into the model camp, but I'm not sure.

I think of it in either form, depending on the application... 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@e...>
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Previous by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Next by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread