• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Caught napping!
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 13 Nov 2001 13:49:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <E163hVz-0005FA-00@s...>
• References: <200111102048.PAA11544@h...><3BEFD820.FE803A93@f...> <3BF0B887.C0F6461@r...> <E163hVz-0005FA-00@s...>

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:35, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 01:07 am, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> > Out of curiousity, how many people think of XML in text terms, not model
> > terms? My guess is that even proponents of well-formed XML eventually
> > fall into the model camp, but I'm not sure.
> 
> I think of it in either form, depending on the application... 

Me too.  I'm hard at work on a model capable of preserving all the
textual details.  Sounds contradictory, but it's kind of fun.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• References:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@e...>
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
• Previous by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Next by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread