• To: Will Johnson <will.johnson@a...>
• Subject: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:38:56 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <005301c16d43$225affb0$cd09110a@sambo> <3BF2D601.3B15989C@r...> <009901c16d4f$afa2a380$2cd0a340@pault> <00c801c16d50$26fb76f0$cd09110a@sambo>

Will Johnson wrote:
> 
> first let me appologize for the broken XML i used in my sample.  and i
> figured out a "workaround"...  if you wrap the node in a CDATA section you
> get all the text including xml tages with no extra effort.

If that's what you want, then fair enough, but you should realize that
these are two *very* different things. That is:

   <foo><bar/></foo>

is different from:

   <foo><![CDATA[<bar/>]]></foo>

The first has two elements; the second has one.

-- Ron

• References:
  • use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Previous by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread