• To: Will Johnson <will.johnson@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:38:15 -0800
• References: <005301c16d43$225affb0$cd09110a@sambo> <3BF2D601.3B15989C@r...> <009901c16d4f$afa2a380$2cd0a340@pault>

PaulT wrote:
> This procedure will produce a broken XML,
> because SAX turns > & <  " and '
> things  into > & < " ' symbols, so the accurate
> processing should turn the symbols back to
> entities.

In this case, it will happen to work, but you're correct about the
general case. A good reason to use something like XMLWriter.

-- Ron

• References:
  • use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Previous by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread