• To: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...>
• Subject: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:43:06 -0500
• Cc: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <E163Tex-0007r2-00@m...>

John Cowan wrote:


> Jonathan Borden scripsit:
>
> > Ok I stand corrected. Internal subsets are easy to use and well
supported as
> > you and john cowan, michael kay and others say.
>
> Some XML applications, like SOAP, have seen fit to ban them.
>

The thought of creating a URI reference identifying a fragment of a SOAP
message causes my brain to degauss.

Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
• Next by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Previous by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Next by thread: RE: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread