• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Subject: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:50:47 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: David Brownell <david-b@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <01a101c16bd5$1435f0d0$0a2e249b@n...> from Jonathan Borden at"Nov 12, 2001 06:52:22 pm"

Jonathan Borden scripsit:

> Ok I stand corrected. Internal subsets are easy to use and well supported as
> you and john cowan, michael kay and others say.

Some XML applications, like SOAP, have seen fit to ban them.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: human-readability
• Next by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Previous by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
• Next by thread: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread