Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 2001-11-11 at 18:06, Marcus Carr wrote: > Yes, that would be okay, but as the responsibility for uniqueness is shifted from the > ID to the xml:id, the system is still going to have to cope - none of the old > documents have xml:id, so documents would need to be considered in the context of the > DTD as it was at the time. It's still a change to the DTD, the system and possibly > the users' applications. Of course! But I don't think there's any around that if we think having things around called "ID" is a good idea. This just seems to me like the least painful way to do it. -- Simon St.Laurent "Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
