• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: ID-ness in XML
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 12:39:50 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1005439897.838.5.camel@l...> from "Simon St.Laurent"at "Nov 10, 2001 07:51:36 pm"

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> I'd make xml:id something that can be used with or without a DTD.  If
> used in a DTD, it would have to be declared of type ID and would have to
> be the only ID on any given attribute.  That seems to avoid a lot of
> pain to me.

Fair enough, but what does this "have to" mean?  On pain of invalidity?

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread